The door is “slightly ajar” to scrapping
Daniel Libeskind’s plan for a sunken memorial at the
World Trade Center site, the chairman of the Lower
Manhattan Development Corp. said Thursday.
But in a statement later Thursday, John Whitehead
backtracked, saying, “We are committed to preserving
Libeskind’s vision, a hallmark of which is the recessed
memorial setting, and the winning memorial design must
be consistent with that vision.”
“It’s now in the hands of the jury to decide,”
Whitehead said at first. “It’s in the jury’s hands. ...
If they believe there is a plan that is far better than
the Libeskind plan.”
When it was presented to the public last December, a
central feature of Libeskind’s plan was leaving the
foundation of the towers 70 feet below ground level
exposed in remembrance of the terrorist attack.
By the time the plan was selected in February, the
depth of the “pit” had been reduced to 30 feet.
Since then, some lower Manhattan residents and
business groups have been lobbying to do away with the
sunken memorial entirely.
At a public hearing last month, Carl Weisbrod, who is
a member of the development corporation’s board and the
president of the Alliance for Downtown New York, a
business group, asked the jury that will choose a design
for a trade center memorial to consider schemes that
place the memorial at ground level.
Speaking at the development corporation’s regular
board meeting, Whitehead said the door to such a design
is “slightly ajar but not very far ajar.”
Libeskind had no immediate comment, his spokeswoman
said.
The jury that was chosen to pick a memorial design
will begin reviewing submissions next month and will
select a plan this fall.
Meanwhile, housing advocates held a news conference
prior to the board meeting questioning why the
development corporation has made no commitment to
develop low- and moderate-income apartments.
“There is a profound failure of leadership here — on
the part of the mayor, the governor and the LMDC — to
address the housing needs of lower Manhattan,” said
Victor Bach, senior housing analyst at the Community
Service Society.
The advocates stood in the back of the room and waved
their signs during a discussion of a development
corporation plan to hold workshops at which downtown
residents would advise the agency on how to spend $1.3
billion in unallocated federal funds.
Originally published on June 12,
2003